LINES OF THE DAY

". . . But the past does not exist independently from the present. Indeed, the past is only past because there is a present, just as I can point to something over there only because I am here. But nothing is inherently over there or here. In that sense, the past has no content. The past -- or more accurately, pastness -- is a position. Thus, in no way can we identify the past as past." p. 15

". . . But we may want to keep in mind that deeds and words are not as distinguishable as often we presume. History does not belong only to its narrators, professional or amateur. While some of us debate what history is or was, others take it into their own hands." p. 153

Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (1995) by Michel-Rolph Trouillot

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Man Friends

An historical novel that would be fun to research and write -- if I were to go in that direction -- is one centering american men's friendship, the language and practice, from the early years through the Civil War. If we see loving relationships between fathers and sons in such a novel, that would be value added.



Without even trying I can think of several bold-faced historical pairs of such friends.

The tenderness in the language with which men of those decades speak of their friends, and their behaviors a joyeous thing.  These are very different from what these days goes by the rubric "bromance." The very word -- tender -- will not be coming out these boy-children's mouths, but was commonly spoken by men about each other's friends in those days.  In letters and journals of these decades you see the men write phrases as he performed such-and-such an act on the behalf of a male friend "as tenderly as a woman," for instance.


It's interesting to google male friendships nineteenth century or 1840's and the majority of the images that come up are two women or a man and a woman.

Friendship is one of the most precious and wonderful of all experiences.  It seems to me that perhaps it was easier for men to be friends in some earlier eras than it is now.  This might be true of women as well: that they could have life-long tender friendships more easily in another time.  I don't know enough about these matters to know.

No comments: