LINES OF THE DAY

". . . But the past does not exist independently from the present. Indeed, the past is only past because there is a present, just as I can point to something over there only because I am here. But nothing is inherently over there or here. In that sense, the past has no content. The past -- or more accurately, pastness -- is a position. Thus, in no way can we identify the past as past." p. 15

". . . But we may want to keep in mind that deeds and words are not as distinguishable as often we presume. History does not belong only to its narrators, professional or amateur. While some of us debate what history is or was, others take it into their own hands." p. 153

Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (1995) by Michel-Rolph Trouillot

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

A.S. Byatt's *Ragnarok: The End of the Gods*

In the end I marveled: how did she present such bleak fatalism with so much verve and energy? I mean here the bleak fatalism aimed not at the old gods of Asgaard, but at us, those who are currently living on this planet, who most certainly are not gods of any kind.
Byatt's really good. But we know that.

Something else she stirred up, a lately musing, that no matter what it is, when it comes to Britain, at some point every writer and particularly any long running television series, has to come back to both WWI and WWII, even when set in the current era.

Does France do this? Does Germany? Russia? Japan? I know the U.S. doesn't.

What a double-whammy trauma the two world wars were for England.
I'm not sure that even the Civil War is like that for us. Of course that was longer ago than the two WWs. Though, perhaps, that's because we have still been fighting that war all this time, just by other names.

No comments: