LINES OF THE DAY

". . . But the past does not exist independently from the present. Indeed, the past is only past because there is a present, just as I can point to something over there only because I am here. But nothing is inherently over there or here. In that sense, the past has no content. The past -- or more accurately, pastness -- is a position. Thus, in no way can we identify the past as past." p. 15

". . . But we may want to keep in mind that deeds and words are not as distinguishable as often we presume. History does not belong only to its narrators, professional or amateur. While some of us debate what history is or was, others take it into their own hands." p. 153

Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (1995) by Michel-Rolph Trouillot

Monday, October 27, 2008

McPln Meets Bollywood

I'm not so crazy about spreading video -- there are so many, and many blogs seem to prefer YouTubes to writing -- because it takes a lot longer to look at a video than to read, at least for me, and so much is so repetitive.

However, thanks to Nancy Lebovitz on Making Light, here's one you really want to see. There are no words to describe it, but the video itself is filled with words.

Does it feel to others like it feels to me, that the entire world -- not to mention myself -- is just holding its breath through the Election Day for POTUS? As if until we really know who is going to be POTUS we cannot sensibly plan ahead for anything?

Vaquero says that everyone he talked to in Barcelona, whether from South America, Europe or Asia, is feeling like this. Even at this enormous arts and literary and cultural festival (that the Jazz Festival was a part of), everyone was talking about this U.S. election. He did not encounter a single person supporting the other ones. If nothing else would, this has to be the overwhelming evidence that this nation has lost its mind. The whole world is pulling for us to recovery our sanity.

In some ways I'm cautiously experiencing a flutter of a coming lightness of being of the sort I haven't felt in many, many years. Rather I've felt an ever weighty sense of repression and oppression and pessimism. This flutter is caused by the elegance of the Obama campaign, which has given one a glimmer of hope, that if he and his people get to run this nation we all, together, can turn things around, and not just turn them around, but do as with the FDR era, actually make the nation better for a lot people than it was before, at the best of times.

That's a hell of a burden of expectation to put on one person, it seems to me. But as Vaquero and I discussed this morning:

Joe who isn't Joe and isn't a plumber compared Obama to Sammy Davis, Jr. (who was, btw, one hell of a tap dancer), and today Stanley Fish compared Obama to both Fred Astaire and Jesus vs Satan in Milton's Purgatory -- talk about over-the-top rhetorical excess! But Vaquero thinks what Obama really is, is the Mozart of politicians.

Vaquero says, "It effortlessly poured out of Mozart. He didn't have to puzzle over it, or tinker, he just knew. His musicality was so deep, and so was his undestanding of instruments and instrumentation, that he knews just what fit where to create not just good effect, but the best effect to carry out the master vision. Thus the elegance. Obama's the Mozart of politics."

I don't want to get symbolic about this election. I support Obama, not because of skin color or in spite of skin color or any of that. I support him because I genuinely think he's the superior candidate. He worked damned hard to get me to think this way. I'm not much of a bandwagon person. However, symbolically? This terrible mess the nation is in? We want Obama to be POTUS because we believe, we hope, that with our help, he can clean it up. Isn't that just the history of this nation? When things are a wreck, we need a black person to show us the way, you could say. Considering the history of this nation, how much throughout its history, events and economy depended on the efforts, so unrecognized, so exploited of African Americans, it is above and beyond time we have an African American POTUS.

BTW, Bruce Sterling was the star this last week at the festival, with Lou Reed and Laurie Anderson -- but while Bruce and Reed were actually there and doing what they were supposed to do, Laurie literally phoned in her part. She probably had a dog agility competition that her appearance was unfortunately scheduled against ....

6 comments:

K. said...

Wow! Great post! This sums it up better than anything I've read.

Your point about the world wanting us to get our sanity back is exactly right. T. and I were in Ireland for a month last summer. When the Irish talked to us about American politics, it was less about Obama and more about how they still couldn't believe that John Kerry wasn't president and what the hell happened? An Obama presidency will be greeted joyously around the world.

On another topic, do you guys like Lila Downs? Her new CD is terrific.

Foxessa said...

Thanks. Yes, we knew, and so did the rest of the world that electing dubya and his criminalsyndicate (where's RICO prosecutons yet?) was a national act of suicide, i.e. insanity.

As for Lila Downs, no, we don't. So much music, so much listening to the purpose, not everything can pass over the time threshold. We're listening to the Louis Armstrong boxed set from his various state dept. sponsored performances in Spain over the years. The Barcelona North American Studies Institute gave it to him, with some other of the CDs,as a little present. You can hear Armstrong leaving the stage and second-lining the musicians around the auditorium at the end of certain performances. Very cool-io.

In any case the American Counselate is bringing him back already in February. The theme this coming year for their cultural calendar is "Black History." Changes are coming.

I hope, hope, hope. If we can keep the thoroughly corrupt and criminal dubya doj from stealing again.

Love, C.

K. said...

The Satchmo collection must be a treasure.

I read about about Lila Downs in Rock-and-Rap Confidential and reviewed her last Sunday.

The Hank W collection is out today. I'm about to go get it!

Frank Partisan said...

The hatred towards Bush around the world, is visceral. The low popularity of Bush, combined with Reaganism imploding the world economy, provides an ideal climate for Obama. Now the Dems will be the establishment. The GOP is hurt forever.

I'm not going to argue with you, about how you vote. I will ask you to judge Obama, once he is in power, on the same standards as Bush; on war and peace, universal healthcare, Cuba, Venezuela etc. If Obama doesn't produce, consider a labor party.

Interesting about Laurie Anderson. She is a bore anyways.

I'm going to a movie with Graeme tomorrow.

Frank Partisan said...

The Mozart analogy is on my mind.

After 8 years of Bush, a broomstick can seem like Mozart. The bar is low.

Obama is a wonderful, charismatic speaker. He was only fair as a senator.

He is not going to deliver on what you believe should be done, Cuba, Iraq, Afghanistan etc.

Better than Bush yes. Mozart no.

Foxessa said...

Ren -- That analogy was used about Sen. Obama's genius as a politician and campaign organizer. We quite understand those qualities don't by any means necessarily translate into the actions one hopes to occur.

OTOH, the neoCONs' regime have bankrupted the entire western capitalist system. We are broke, broke, broke, and jobless, jobless, jobless, except for those nations that have been working hard on green, alternative, sustainable energy industries. So if he's president all he inherits is a junkyard. That he's willing to take it and try to make some some sense out of it and start the generations' work necessary to clean it up, well, that is worthy of praise, don't you think?

He's not had much time as a Senator, so no, he hasn't accomplished a lot. But he and his wife accomplished quite a bit locally, on the ground, in their Chicago. That he hasn't had to time to do much can also mean he's not dragging the weight of years of compromise and bs behind him that anyone older and in the Senate for much longer has -- or even Clinton has, for all her short time there.

Love, C.