LINES OF THE DAY

". . . But the past does not exist independently from the present. Indeed, the past is only past because there is a present, just as I can point to something over there only because I am here. But nothing is inherently over there or here. In that sense, the past has no content. The past -- or more accurately, pastness -- is a position. Thus, in no way can we identify the past as past." p. 15

". . . But we may want to keep in mind that deeds and words are not as distinguishable as often we presume. History does not belong only to its narrators, professional or amateur. While some of us debate what history is or was, others take it into their own hands." p. 153

Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (1995) by Michel-Rolph Trouillot

Monday, October 22, 2007

Travels With Herodotus

The meditation memoir on Herodotus the man and the historian and the traveler, of noted Polish journalist, Ryszard Kapuscinski. Herodotus's Histories was his companion on his first travels outside of Poland as a very young journalist, during the era of Stalin. Herodotus went with him on many other of his assignments as well, including Africa. His reports from Africa, particularly the war(s) in Angola against the apartheid South Africa and the other U.S. backed forces may be what he's most well-known for.

This comes from close the end of this, his final book, pp. 245-246. These are thoughts he was having while staying on the Isle of Goree, one of the most infamous of the African Atlantic coast slave castles, from which so many Africans were transported on the Middle Passage to death in the New World.

[ How often do we consider the fact that the treasures and riches of the world were created from time immemorial by slaves? From the irrigation systems of Mesopotamia, the Great Wall(s) of China, the pyramids of Egypt, and acropolis of Athens, to the plantations of sugar on Cuba and of cotton in Louisiana and Arkansas, the coal mines of Kolyma and Germany's highways? And wars! From the dawn of history they were waged in order to capture slaves. Seize them, chain them, whip them, rape them, feel satisfaction at having another human being as one's property. The acquisition of slaves was an important, and frequently sole cause of wars, their powerful and even undisguised prime motivation.

Those who managed to survive the transatlantic journey (it was said that theships carried 'black cargo') brought with them their own Afro-Egyptian culture, the same one that had fascinated Herodotus and which he had described so tirelessly ion his book long before that culture reached the Western hemisphere.

And what of Herodotus himself, what sort of slaves did he have? How many? How did he treat them? .... What happened to them after Herodotus's death? Were they put up for sale in the marketplace? .... ]

I finished the Kapuscinski volume a few days ago. Currently I am reading a most painful work of history on the Reconstruction. Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War by Nicholas Lemann, has just been published. It is another account of that period about which hardly anyone knows anything these days, and counters with real history that little which is "known," which is almost entirely lies. Though Lemann is not the first to write this, and indeed, during the period it was well known for what it was -- the Civil War was not finished with surrender by the Confederacy. The war continued, but this time directly against the former slaves, in order to have what Kapuscinski stated above:

[ "And wars! From the dawn of history they were waged in order to capture slaves. Seize them, chain them, whip them, rape them, feel satisfaction at having another human being as one's property. The acquisition of slaves was an important, and frequently sole cause of wars, their powerful and even undisguised prime motivation." ]

There is no disguising that this next movement of the Civil War was motivated by this -- that the Civil War was about this and nothing else. The accounts from the archives and collections that Lemann brings forth proves this without doubt. It was also a further war against the Union. Which backs up our sense here that this nation is NOT a nation, which came into bold conviction post the failure of the levees, which the North and Grant, in the more consuming interests of the vast plutocratic fortunes being made, and the federal government -- bolstered with many a legislator returned by foul means from the South (sound familiar?) allowed this to happen.

The nearest we ever came to being a united nation was with the New Deal and WWII -- when government worked! After that the same reactionary forces that came to the fore prior, during and post the Civil War, have waged relentless warfare upon the government, to make it not work, to make it be the enemy, just as it was perceived all along by the states that became the confederacy.

This is a terrible book. I sometimes skip entire pages because of they are contemporary newspaper reports of the terrorism the southern gentlemen carried out on the bodies of the former slaves: men, women and children. Holocaust of torture, burnings, rape and murder against entire communities, relentless and continual.

As for the stories of the carpetbaggers? Propaganda, lies, created by the sons of the confederacy, deliberately. They were helping set up schools and banks and advising the former slaves on how to build their own farms. Since such evil was being carried out against black people who cared ultimately, once the "carpetbaggers" were forced out by terror and torture and murder?

The slavers won.

What we've got today is the consequence.

2 comments:

Foxessa said...

We all know the role lynchings played in the terrorizing of the African American population post the Confederate surrender.

And it's back.

For instance, right here in the NY Region -- from yesterday's NY Times, there's a report of 8 noose events here in the last week.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/21/nyregion/21noose.html?em&ex=1193198400&en=af46292d7d8e0799&ei=5087%0A

The Civil War was about nothing else BUT slavery, and the Civil War continues even today (anyone who says racial prejudice and worse against African Americans is over and done with is someone who doesn't interact with black people daily, isn't affected him or her self, and lives where they don't even see black people generally), cannot be denied.

Because why is it then, that even today, anywhere in the country, you have overt violence directed against African Americans in numbers that are not met with by any other group, not even Americans who happen to have come from Muslim cultures? Why is it that EVEN TODAY white people will get angry at seeing an African American man with a non-AfAm woman? Why is it as soon as the schools were desegregated there began a concerted effort to get rid of public education via the propaganda (as against the government and anything else in our public life) that public education is inferior and ineffective?

The Civil War continues. This isn't a nation.

Additionally, all those fires in San Diego County, something like 65 square miles on fire, firefighters taken off the line in order to evacuate the householders who did NOT evacuate when told to --

Well, I'm reading all over the place posts of this nature:

"Our people evacuate when told to, unlike those blacks in NOLA who just waited around for somebody else to do the work."

Tell me racial hatred and discrimination against African Americans isn't alive and well.

Graeme said...

I agree 100%