". . . But the past does not exist independently from the present. Indeed, the past is only past because there is a present, just as I can point to something over there only because I am here. But nothing is inherently over there or here. In that sense, the past has no content. The past -- or more accurately, pastness -- is a position. Thus, in no way can we identify the past as past." p. 15

". . . But we may want to keep in mind that deeds and words are not as distinguishable as often we presume. History does not belong only to its narrators, professional or amateur. While some of us debate what history is or was, others take it into their own hands." p. 153

Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (1995) by Michel-Rolph Trouillot

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Does This Knock Murdoch Off the Media Hook?

In any case, it seems the motives for the Norwegian bloody bomb-and-shoot attack were the inverse of the immediate usual suspects' howling.

ETA:  Profile of Anders Behring Breivik, as complete as can be at this stage of the investigation.

No comments: