LINES OF THE DAY

". . . But the past does not exist independently from the present. Indeed, the past is only past because there is a present, just as I can point to something over there only because I am here. But nothing is inherently over there or here. In that sense, the past has no content. The past -- or more accurately, pastness -- is a position. Thus, in no way can we identify the past as past." p. 15

". . . But we may want to keep in mind that deeds and words are not as distinguishable as often we presume. History does not belong only to its narrators, professional or amateur. While some of us debate what history is or was, others take it into their own hands." p. 153

Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (1995) by Michel-Rolph Trouillot

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Hipster Racism

With many thanks to The Angry Black Woman for finally providing a label I've been groping for, ever since that Lenny Bruce spew was thrown into my face as a great way to fight racism. That Lenny Bruce approach just didn't make it for me, and this explains why. (Of course we all know people who had / have this reaction to the LB spew -- or, say that ugly Blazing Saddles movie -- have no sense of humor, and certainly are no hipsters. Fortunately only second part is true. Such people also know what is funny and what is not, and this wasn't funny, and it wasn't satire either. People who live insulated lives like the Nyer editors are incapable of doing satire, because they are not hungry enough.*)

It also explains a certain class of racist who finds it unacceptable insult to his white entitlement for him to be denied the use of certain words and phrases, since 'they' use them. It's a part of the neo blackface / ministrelsy, proving what a cool cat s/he is (Lee Atwater, for instance was one of these, yanno, playin' da blues, on a Real! Guitar!), while deep inside terrified that, yanno, 'real' poc are of course, far more hip and cool than s/he can ever be, even in his dreams.

And that explains how the New Yorker did what it did, and why it can't accept it was wrong, because, yanno, we're THE NEW YORKER and we OWN the crown as the most sophisticated and hip of all.

Um, breaking news here, NYer -- not so much.

Now, apologize already!

For more on hipster racism, go here and here.

* * In case anyone wonders, NYer writers treat this casa very well, and we're grateful. This isn't sour grapes but authentic outrage at a publication that we'd always enjoyed, read and admired.

4 comments:

Audrey said...

Thank you for blogging about this. I didn't have a term for this particular type of racism myself.

It's basically, "let's appropriate everything that's 'hip' about any culture without creating anything new of our own to contribute, and then make fun of the people we culture vultured from.

Foxessa said...

Neo blackface and entitlement, and geeze, don't be so sensitive! Get a sense of humor!

Love, C.

Frank Partisan said...

The reason Obama campaign jumped on The New Yorker, is to distance him from any reminders of the black liberation struggle. The cover was made in support of Obama.

Cynthia McKinney chose a hip hop artist as a vice president. Would Obama have rappers in his entourage?

Foxessa said...

Rosa Clemente is not a hip hop artist. She does not rap. She's a hip hop activist. Very different thing.

The NYer cover does not support Obama, whatever the NYer might have thought -- but then the NYer didn't think. That cover provided mucho fodder for Obama haters, and that the Nyer didn't know that or didn't care, says far worse about the Nyer.

But then the NYer has a very long tradition of racism and white supremacy. Check out Ishmael Reed's latest on Counterpunch here.

To say that the Obama campaign wants to distance him from black liberation struggle makes no sense in the context of his history, which history is described within the feature on his earlier years inside that infamous cover issue of the magazine.

Love, C.